Journal Archive Fellowship Prize Workshops About Submit Join the Forum
From Issue 07 — Winter 2025/26

Arguments, not assignments.

Themed issues of original essays, short arguments, and dialogues across ethics, political philosophy, epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind, aesthetics, and philosophy of science.

Recent pieces

Read the argument, then the objection.

6 pieces
Political PhilosophyIssue 07

Is Consent Enough to Make an Unequal Arrangement Just?

A defence of the view that procedural consent cannot, by itself, legitimate a bargain struck under conditions of unequal power.

↳ Read the Counterargument by R. Adeyemi
EpistemologyIssue 07

Is Ignorance Ever a Form of Integrity?

Why choosing not to know can sometimes preserve moral agency rather than diminish it.

↳ Read the Counterargument by D. Novak
Philosophy of MindIssue 07

What Do We Owe the Machines We Build?

An argument against grounding artificial moral status in behavioural mimicry alone.

↳ Read the Counterargument by T. Lindqvist
Political PhilosophyIssue 06

Can a Democracy Be Too Democratic?

A defence of institutional friction against the demand for perfect legislative responsiveness.

↳ Read the Counterargument by M. Okonkwo
EthicsIssue 06

Do Future People Have Rights?

The puzzle behind climate obligations owed to people who do not yet exist to hold them.

↳ Read the Counterargument by I. Chen
DialogueIssue 06

On Believing What You Cannot Prove

Two editors argue, in alternating voice, over whether justified belief requires evidence at all.

↳ A dialogue, not a rebuttal

Full issues, including every piece above, are available as PDFs in the archive.

Our defining feature

The Counterargument.

A published essay can be paired with a formal, published objection written by someone else — naming the specific move in the argument being contested. You read the claim and the strongest challenge to it side by side, not the claim alone.

It is the reason pieces are revised before they are accepted: an argument that has only ever been agreed with has not yet been tested.

Step 01

An argument is published

One clear central claim, defended in the author’s own words.

Step 02

An objection is written

A second writer names the exact premise or inference they contest.

Step 03

You read them together

Claim and challenge appear side by side — not the claim alone.

Formats

Five ways to make an argument.

650–1,000 words

Essay

A sustained argument for one central claim.

400–650 words

Short

A compact argument, made in fewer words.

300–600 words

Counterargument

A formal objection responding to a published essay.

800–1,300 words

Dialogue

Two voices working a question through in alternating turns.

250–500 words

Response

A reply to the current Dialectic Question.

Want to write one?

Read the guidelines →